Loading
10

Valentin Bratoev 4th meter spike

raylight 2010-07-22 • 8793 views • 27
 

27 comments

EPINEPHRINEableBG 399 7
11 years ago
+1
Oh I remember that point.. spectacular :)
jangooPK 67 2
11 years ago
+1
fantastic
EdoKaglieIT 432 4
12 years ago
+1
Formidable flight by Marlon and fantastic attack by Bratoev!
Fadhel AbbasBH 1513 14
12 years ago
+1
Good timing of the attack
ZytaPL 1332 11
13 years ago
+2
His twin brother is setter.
HeeelMooiNL 220 4
13 years ago
+2
Isn't Bratoev a setter?
NightFoxBG 1457 14
13 years ago
+1
It's very hard to make a call becasue, if the ball is in our half of the court it's our point because they are interfering with the set like Joel said ... and I think the refferee didn't want to make a such important decision, so he let the play go ...
jannkesPL 279 6
13 years ago
0
miał niewiele miejsca przy antence, a mimo to huknął... :P
Joel2718CA 426 7
13 years ago
0
Zhekov was backcourt. This is quite a bad call to decide the 3rd set of the match. Even if the ref doesn't know what happened, if a backcourt setter and an opposing blocker touch the ball above the plane of the net at the same time, the whistle needs to blow. Either Brazil was penetrating the net and interfering with the set, so its Bulgaria's point, or there is a back row violation on the setter for essentially 'blocking' the ball. Even if Brazil didn't touch the ball its still Brazil's point, a backrow setter is not allowed to play the ball over the net from in front of the attack line unless he contacts the ball from below the net, certainly not the case. So the only way that this is not a bad call is if Zhekov didn't touch the ball at all, and well he obviously did. And Brazil was definitely not penetrating the net. And if they were, well the play should have stopped regardless. And its kind of annoying to see all the fans celebrating this. This is the equivalent to having a backrow rightside player attack the ball from 5 feet in front of the attack line, and get away with it because the ref didn't realize he was in fact a backrow player when it happened. By the way, what were the commentators saying?
raylightBGAuthor 3006 15
13 years ago
0
If it is an attack, what is the problem? He didn't cross the net?
FishyPL 9 1
13 years ago
+1
He touched it and ball came to the other side what is taken as an attack, so referee should notice that..
Joel2718CA 426 7
13 years ago
+1
But.. did the backrow setter not just touch the ball and play it over? Or am I missing something here?
p…y 197 4
13 years ago
0
Potężny atak, Bratoev to bardzo dobry zawodnik. Rezenede zawsze ma o coś pretensje, ale i tak liczy się decyzja sędziów :E
raylightBGAuthor 3006 15
13 years ago
0
Bratoev decided the game with Netherlands at the ECH, which granted us the semifinal spot with 15 pts in three sets - 5 blocks and 10/18 in attack. That was when he had no international experience.
RenanZBR 1538 15
13 years ago
+3
Putting the blame in the Judge won't help..... Bu tthat hit was great. He came to attack aiming straight down !!!
raylightBGAuthor 3006 15
13 years ago
+1
Also, the judges didn't give yellow cards to Resende on numerious occasions in the first match. At the second, both Resende and Prandi got yellow cards, but that was the only sharp reaction of Prandi and standard behavior from Resende. The Brazilian coach is very emotional and if the judges were exact, we could get many yellow cards in the games. I like maniacs, but the rules don't :D
raylightBGAuthor 3006 15
13 years ago
0
I don't think that the judges helped Bulgaria more than they helped Brazil. There were couple of aces deeply in the field, which were called out in favor of Brazil.
MalboroPL 545 3
13 years ago
0
Gdyby tak dobrze się przyjrzeć, to Żekow wykonał jakby przypadkowy blok, a że był w 2 linii to było to niedozwolone:)
Mateusz2008PL 163 5
13 years ago
0
Chyba sędziowie trochę pomogli w tej akcji Bułgarii, wiadomo gospodarzom zawsze się trochę pomaga, a ten gwóźdź dosyć solidny :D
SomeonePL 875 10
13 years ago
-1
Można powiedzieć: spektakularna akcja. Każdy marzy o tym by w ten sposób zakończy seta.
A co do reakcji Rezende to... hmm ciężka sprawa. Żekow na pewno był w drugiej linii. Nie podjął próby ataku w "normalnym" tego słowa znaczeniu, ale w myśl przepisów każde przebicie piłki na stronę przeciwną jest atakiem. Z kolei każdy atak zawodnika nad linią taśmy z pola ataku i zawodnik ten jest w drugiej lini powoduje utratę punktu dla jego drużyny. Chyba, więc Rezende miał rację.
Tutaj źródło: http://www.siatkowka.net/siatkowka-zasady-gry/gra/przebieg-gry/atak.html
FishyPL 9 1
13 years ago
0
Chyba masz rację, na pewno był w 2. lini, bo 3 atakujących nachodzi do ataku.. Dziwne, że sędziowie nie wychwycili..
qsekPL 831 10
13 years ago
0
mnie się zdaje, że Żekow popełnił błąd- był w drugiej linii( chyba) a przebił piłkę (nie ważne, że przez przypadek) lub mógł przełożyć rękę. i właśnie chyba o to chodzi Rezende.
vtnklmdcPL 686 14
13 years ago
+1
Rezende zawsze ma jakieś problemy
FishyPL 9 1
13 years ago
0
Reakcje Bernardo piękne ;D
MalboroPL 545 3
13 years ago
+3
Taki atak na zakończenie seta-coś pięknego:D
jernej94SI 102 12
13 years ago
+1
I wish I could do that :)

TOP20 of April

Loading
0