In the second geim we make from 13 : 22 => 23:23 lol and if Aleksiev has done this counteratack we would have not only the confidense of the 24th point itself (2 points difference), but alwso the moral one.And Matey was in great survingrow.From 2:0 geims its hard to take 3 geims in a row agaist an opponent from yout class. So this point was to be matchwinning point ,in fact was coachchanging point ! So sad that we missed it but it can happens to everyone.
I don't see how you can blame this on Alexiev.. I heard about his error, but now that I've seen it I think it's greatly exagerated. It was in the second set and it didn't even finish the set, the ace after did.
deathvader666, I am sorry that I missunderstood you, I apologize for my words.
This situation in the set and the way that the match was lost still hurts
Yes, my reaction was not on the claim that Alexiev lost the match, which can be debated, it was on defining that moment as "best" in the game. With all those spikes, blocks, serves and defense from both teams it is strange to think that for the best moment
don't matter if they lost the match. it's similar to Nikolov words about fourth match in semis now against Lube "we won 4th match, but if we will loose in 5th match this victory won't mean anything".
They played like that in the first match which they won, they probably would have played like that at the last group stage if they would meet your team, but they are too young and inexperienced to play big final like that. On finals, young teams are going out against Brazil with fear
https://volleybox.net/poland-cuba-highlights-m966